PDA

View Full Version : Dreaming of a park on Sheridan Expressway



Kris
December 22nd, 2003, 04:06 PM
Dreaming of a park on Sheridan Expressway

By Heather McRea

When South Bronx residents look at the Sheridan Expressway, some see a concrete roadway. Others see an opportunity for a little bit of green.

"It is a stretch of highway that doesn’t really go anywhere," said Deltas Vernon Cole, assistant director of Nos Quedamos, a community development organization. Nos Quedamos has joined a handful of South Bronx groups, politicians and regional transportation advocates pushing to have the 1.25-mile-long expressway paved over — not with asphalt, but with grass and flowers to make it a 28-acre park.

"This would give people an opportunity to have a large recreational park in the South Bronx," Cole said, quoting national and state standards that recommend five to six acres of open land for every 1,000 people. He said the South Bronx had about one acre per 1,000.

But not all of the surrounding community is sold on the idea.

When Frank Gonzalez looks at the Sheridan Expressway (Interstate-895), which splits the Crotona Park East and Bronx River neighborhoods, he sees an escape route for the days when the traffic on the Cross Bronx Expressway has slowed to an agonizing crawl.

"Even though it is small, it is an important highway to the borough," said Gonzalez, district manager of Community Board 9. He said the community has enough parks — some already underutilized, such as Soundview Park, "the best kept secret in the South Bronx. The Community Board has taken the position that the Sheridan Expressway is imperative. People do use it."

Built in the mid-1950s, the expressway was part of Robert Moses’ plan to combat traffic on the region’s main arteries by building more roadways to parallel them. The Sheridan, along with the Major Deegan and Bruckner expressways, was built at the same time to steer motorists through the Bronx.

The Sheridan was originally planned to connect north all the way to the New England Thruway, but that idea was scrapped in the 1960s when troubles with building through the Bronx Park and existing communities were recognized.

The debate over the expressway’s future began when the department started looking at possible improvements to the interchanges that connect it to 177th Street and the Cross Bronx Expressway in the north and the Bruckner Expressway in the south.

When the project proposals for these two interchanges were released, the Tri-State Transportation Campaign, a watchdog organization, read them. It saw the opportunity to turn a little-used highway into a 1.25-mile park.

"It is a redundant highway," said Lisa Schreibman, spokeswoman for the transportation campaign. "Not many people use it."

According to the State Department of Transportation, the Sheridan carries about 34,000 cars daily.

"If we shut down the expressway, then the question is where would the cars go," said Peter King, project manager with the department. He is now measuring the impact that closing the expressway would have on surrounding roadways.

The department is looking at several alternatives for the expressway but not the original idea of expanding it north, King said. In several years, once all the required studies are completed and hearings are held, the state transportation commissioner will make the final decision on the expressway’s fate, said Alex Dudley, spokesman for the agency.

"There is going to have to be some very frank discussion about the repercussions of this," he said. "While it is not the Cross Bronx Expressway, that is still an awful lot of cars to put into a neighborhood or several neighborhoods."

http://www.jrn.columbia.edu/studentwork/bronxbeat/1999/april/april5/images/dreaming.gif

http://www.jrn.columbia.edu/studentwork/bronxbeat/1999/april/april5/dreaming.html


The Sheridan Expressway (http://www.nycroads.com/roads/sheridan)


South Bronx neighborhoods short on open spaces

By Dina Cappiello

When spoken in the Bronx, the words "environmental justice" conjure up images of neighborhoods with too many waste transfer stations, an unfair share of truck traffic and the sludge generated by millions of flushing toilets, not the leafy trees and rocky outcrops of Pelham Bay and Van Cortlandt Parks.

"We are always on the receiving end of all the negatives," said Delmas Vernon Cole, assistant director of Nos Quedamos/We Stay, an environmental advocacy organization in the South Bronx. "Other communities get the positive aspects."

Communities of color have less open space than more affluent, white sections of the borough, according to a preliminary report obtained by The Bronx Beat from the New York City Environmental Justice Alliance (NYJA). The organization, a group of 16 nonprofit groups committed to providing low-income communities with a cleaner environment, expects to complete its study in June. So far, it shows that Mott Haven, Longwood/Hunts Point, High Bridge/Mount Eden and Morris Heights/Fordham, with populations more than 65 percent minority, have less than one acre of parkland per 1,000 people. The mostly white communities of Riverdale, Pelham Bay and Morris Park have 2.5 acres of parkland per 1,000 people because they contain the borough’s two biggest parks.

Community-based organizations in the southern part of the borough have been aware of their lack of open space, but until now have been crippled because of a lack of numbers. "When we begin investigations that quantify and document this trend, our case is stronger," Cole said. Nos Quedamos wants to build tree nurseries in communities where there are few parks; Neighborhood Open Space Coalition suggests expanding into the Bronx the city’s 350-mile Greenway system, a series of trails that would connect all five boroughs; NYJA recommends that the Parks Department protect the 31 Bronx community gardens to be auctioned off by the city in May.

"It’s racism," said Omar Freilla, the transportation coordinator for NYJA, who used records of land the Parks Department owns in each community district to compose the report. "There’s plenty of space in these communities to make green space. There’s 14,000 vacant lots in the city."

In poor neighborhoods, parks tend to be small plots given to the Parks Department by other city agencies that are converted to playgrounds and garden lots, according to Ed Skyler, press secretary for the city’s Parks and Recreation Department. Forty-seven were acquired in "underserved communities" last year, where the amount of space per 1,000 people is less than one-and-a-half acres, he said. In 1995, the Parks Department also started GreenStreets, a program that has landscaped 300 Department of Transportation traffic triangles in the city, 51 in the Bronx.

The small contributions, roughly .1 acre per 1,000 people, are not enough to make up the difference between white and minority areas in the Bronx or any other borough of New York City, according to NYJA.

"I think we have been very aggressive in acquiring land not suitable for development," said Skyler, who added that it’s easier to acquire parks in areas that are pre-existing wetlands. These wetland areas are concentrated in the northern half of the borough.

"This city has less open space than any other city in America," said Dave Lutz, program director for the Neighborhood Open Space Coalition, an organization dedicated to keeping what little green space the city has, and fighting for more. In New York City, open space averages 2.6 acres per 1,000 people, while the national average is 6 acres.

Compare that to the Longwood section of the South Bronx, where Al Quinones, 42, has logged thousands of hours of volunteer time for the Parks Department taking care of a portion of the community’s .494 acres of open space per 1,000 people. He has worked at the playground, on 152nd and Leggett Avenue, for 19 years.

"Open space is not the problem," he said. "It’s the utilization of open space that is the problem. If I wasn’t here to open this place up, lend out jump ropes or protect the trees, no one else would do it."

The Parks Department says maintenance is a consequence of park size. Large parks have a 24-hour staff, while smaller gardens and playgrounds are visited once or twice a day, said Ed Skyler, a department spokesman.

Quinones says that it is not enough. "They’ll sweep for an hour then they’re gone," he said. "The Parks Department do what? The Parks Department does nothing."

http://www.jrn.columbia.edu/studentwork/bronxbeat/1999/april/april12/spaces.html

Kris
February 5th, 2004, 10:17 AM
A Community Plan for Moses’ ‘Highway to Nowhere’ (http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/feature-commentary/20030818/202/495)

http://www.gothamgazette.com/graphics/SheridanBig.gif

Merry
July 13th, 2010, 07:41 AM
Plan to Remove Bronx Expressway Gains Traction

By SAM DOLNICK

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/07/13/nyregion/SHERIDAN/SHERIDAN-articleLarge.jpg

For more than a decade, a plan pushed by some South Bronx residents and transportation advocates has sat on the fringes of the State Transportation Department’s to-do list, in part because it would be a radical undoing: tearing down the Sheridan Expressway.

Although the plan has no real precedent in New York, advocates recite the benefits. They say it would ease traffic, improve neighborhood life and right a decades-old wrong committed by the master planner Robert Moses of building an unnecessary highway.

As other proposals for the Sheridan have been tossed aside, the idea to tear it down has improbably progressed to the center of the state’s rethinking of the highway, which runs only a mile and a quarter long between the Cross Bronx and Bruckner Expressways.
In the process, the Sheridan, a reliable thoroughfare for truckers and an eyesore for Hunts Point residents, has become something else: a battleground in a national fight to take urban spaces back from the automobile.

“We’re rolling back the freeway system,” said John Norquist, president and chief executive of the Congress for a New Urbanism, a group based in Chicago that promotes walkable cities. He pointed to Portland, Ore.; San Francisco; and Milwaukee, where he was mayor, as cities that have removed highways running through urban areas.

Mr. Norquist said the Sheridan was “a big important example because it’s in New York and it’s very visible; it would inspire other people that are trying to do the same thing.”

State transportation officials have been studying the Sheridan for years. They have narrowed the field of proposals to three, including a plan to “demap” the roadway, which would probably lead to its removal.

On Tuesday, officials will release long-awaited results of a study of the traffic implications for keeping and removing the Sheridan. While no final decision is expected, the report could presage the road’s fate.

“We realize that we can’t just look at the highway facility itself; we need to look at the impact of a highway through the community it runs through,” said Phillip Eng, the city’s regional director of the State Transportation Department. “It needs to focus on not just moving traffic.”

The Sheridan carries roughly 50,000 vehicles a day, according to state officials. It provides a route for truckers to reach the major food distribution center in Hunts Point but also acts as a physical barrier between local residents and the Bronx River.

Removing the Sheridan would open up 13 acres of open space along the river, land that advocates want to connect with some 15 other acres of service roads and riverfront property to create 1,200 affordable housing units, commercial and industrial space, and amenities like playgrounds, swimming pools and soccer fields.

“This proposal is really rooted in the environmental justice battles that low-income communities have been fighting for decades,” said Joan Byron of the Pratt Center for Community Development, a member of the campaign to remove the Sheridan. “If you look at globally competitive cities, they’re all looking at the spaces they gave over to highways decades ago, and they’re rethinking those decisions.”

In contemplating Mr. Moses’ legacy, the Sheridan stands as more an asterisk than a triumph. It was conceived as cutting across the northeastern Bronx, but local opposition foiled the plan because the road would have gone through part of the Bronx Zoo.

Still, removing the Sheridan would be a bold decision; after all, it received a $27 million upgrade in 2004.

“The Sheridan, physically, is really a new highway,” said Sonia Pichardo, a State Transportation Department official.

The last major removal of a New York City highway was of elevated portions of the West Side Highway, most of which were removed in stages from 1976 to 1989. (In 1973, a truck fell through the highway at Gansevoort Street.)

The Southern Bronx River Watershed Alliance, a coalition of Bronx and citywide environmental, housing and transportation groups, say the Sheridan, no matter its condition, is unnecessary. It links two highways, the group points out, that already intersect to the east.

The plan to remove the highway proposes new ramps from the Bruckner that would improve access to the Hunts Point market. A plan to keep the Sheridan also calls for new ramps from the Bruckner to the market but seeks to preserve the Sheridan as an alternative to other traffic-clogged highways. A third plan essentially keeps the highway as it now stands. The state has been evaluating the traffic implications of all three plans since 2008.

For the thousands of truckers who pass through Hunts Point every night, improving the highway is seen as far more essential than a desire for open space.

“Eliminating the Sheridan would bring things backwards a bit and make it worse,” said Matthew D’Arrigo, a third-generation produce distributor and co-president of the Hunts Point Terminal Produce Cooperative Association. “The job is to try and fix the situation, not to make a park. This is about highway stuff and traffic.”

Mr. D’Arrigo said that even if the new route added just a few minutes of time to truckers’ trips to and from the market, “a few minutes of truckers’ time on a bad day will stifle the entire community.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/nyregion/13sheridan.html?_r=1&ref=nyregion

vanshnookenraggen
July 16th, 2010, 05:08 PM
Seems like the DOT is going to make getting rid of this highway as difficult as possible. This is such a good plan that only someone as bone-headed as a traffic engineer could oppose it.

Merry
July 17th, 2010, 03:22 AM
State engineers warn traffic will increase if highway comes down

http://brie.hunter.cuny.edu/hpe/wp-content/themes/busybee-new/thumb.php?src=http://brie.hunter.cuny.edu/hpe/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sheridan_illustration_website.jpg&w=540&h=270&zc=1&q=90 (http://brie.hunter.cuny.edu/hpe/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sheridan_illustration_website.jpg)
The state unveiled one plan for retaining the Sheridan Expressway, and another for tearing it down.

By Joe Hirsch

Without the Sheridan Expressway, rush hour traffic on some Hunts Point streets would nearly double over the next 20 years, state traffic engineers told an impatient and occasionally angry crowd of about 60 Hunts Point residents, community advocates and business leaders gathered at Casita Maria on Simpson Street on July 13.

The prediction met with skepticism from the Southern Bronx River Watershed Alliance, the coalition that wants the Sheridan to be demolished and replaced with parks, housing and businesses.

The meeting, the first with stakeholders in a year, showed that reaching a consensus on whether the state’s most controversial highway should be retained or demolished remained elusive.

The split between the proprietors of businesses in the Hunts Point food distribution center and the Watershed Alliance is as wide as ever. And a Mott Haven-based advocacy organization weighed-in with the charge that Hunts Point’s gain would be their community’s loss, if trucks that now use the Sheridan were rerouted onto the Major Deegan Expressway, instead.

Furthermore, the state Department of Transportation insisted that its responsibility would end with the demolition of the Sheridan. The state would simply erect fences around the vacant lot created by removing the highway, and the land would remain derelict until other agencies decided what to do with it, said DOT engineer Gil Mosseri.

“We’re disappointed that land use and economic analysis is not going to be factored in,” said Veronica Vanterpool of the Watershed Alliance, which includes several South Bronx community groups, including Sustainable South Bronx, the Point CDC and Mothers on the Move.

When an environmental impact statement, scheduled to be unveiled next year, is completed, she said, “We’ll have to have a very critical eye.”

Local homeowner Jose Ortiz complained about the constant pollution from the traffic, and emphatically called for a park to be built where the highway now stands. Before the Sheridan was built in the early 1960s, “there was a park there and they took it off. The kids used to play there,” he said.

But truckers and the businesses they serve in the market want to see the Sheridan remain. Demolishing the route so many delivery trucks take from the George Washington Bridge to the market would hurt and cost South Bronx residents jobs, they contend.

“I find the whole thing to be about a land use and park choice, not traffic,” said Matthew D’Arrigo, president of the Hunts Point Produce Market. He charged that the groups advocating removal of the Sheridan “don’t represent the neighborhoods; they represent themselves.”

Those who want the highway to remain found an ally in Jaime Rivera of For a Better Bronx, an advocacy organization headquartered in Mott Haven. While the Watershed Alliance planners say trucks should reach Hunts Point by turning south from the George Washington and taking the Major Deegan to the Bruckner, Rivera said increased traffic on the Deegan would make asthma problems worse for residents.

“We can’t support something that takes from one neighborhood to serve another,” he said. “The Sheridan is key,” Rivera said, adding that his own father has worked as a trucker his entire life, including a stint at the Hunts Point market. He said, though, he would be supportive as long as truckers’ livelihoods are taken into consideration, “in a plan that’s not going to decrease their income.”

Whether the Sheridan is torn down or not, the planners want to create a new ramp from the Bruckner Expressway to speed traffic to the market. But each traffic projection the engineers displayed concluded that without the Sheridan, traffic would increase at peak hours in Hunts Point and Longwood, modestly in some areas but sharply in others.

Where Southern Boulevard meets Westchester Avenue and surrounding streets, the projections predict increases in both car and truck traffic, from 1,760 cars and 80 trucks per hour during the morning rush hour today, to 3,240 cars and 180 trucks per hour without the Sheridan.

If the Sheridan were retained traffic would still increase, the engineers said, but truck traffic would stay the same and the car traffic would rise less, to 2,070 cars an hour.
Expressing skepticism, some at the meeting called on the DOT to make public the factors it measured in arriving at its conclusions. “NYSDOT’s analysis probably overstates how much traffic,” wrote Joan Byron, a planner from the Watershed Alliance in an email message.

“But,” she continued, “if the decision is made based on the benefits (freeing the land for development, removing the barrier between existing neighborhoods and the river, and ultimately reducing overall through traffic), compared to the actual increase in traffic on local streets, the traffic alone shouldn’t be a deal breaker.”

The DOT officials continually insisted that the state was committed to gathering as much community input as possible before making a decision in 2012.
More workshops and public sessions are in store, the DOT brass assured people, via community board meetings.

http://brie.hunter.cuny.edu/hpe/?p=4135

vanshnookenraggen
July 17th, 2010, 06:08 AM
Furthermore, the state Department of Transportation insisted that its responsibility would end with the demolition of the Sheridan. The state would simply erect fences around the vacant lot created by removing the highway, and the land would remain derelict until other agencies decided what to do with it, said DOT engineer Gil Mosseri.

Translation: "Dear poor people, **** you"

Traffic engineers always cry that traffic will increase without the highways. Robert Moses yelled this for years. The fact is that this has never been the cast, highways get torn down around the world and the traffic disperses, it doesn't get worse. The DOT just doesn't want to lose part of its own property.