PDA

View Full Version : Brooklyn Politicians - Crap Candidates = Crap Representation



BrooklynRider
November 4th, 2007, 12:19 AM
The woman beloe would be the same Yvette Clarke who lied about her college education, failed to understand, let alone answer questions on existing policy. She helped turn her election into a debate over whether "white" people had a right to run in the district. She won and we got a friggin' ninny doing squat. Another Brooklynite from this district now collecting a federal welfare check.

November 3, 2007 (http://www.brooklynpaper.com/sections/30/43/)
In Congress, Clarke last among firsts

By Dana Rubinstein
The Brooklyn Paper


Brooklyn’s newest congresswoman has gotten off to a slow start.


Rep. Yvette Clarke (D–Park Slope) has written fewer bills than all but three members of her 54-person freshman class — and she didn’t even roll out her first piece of legislation until earlier this month, after getting wind that an influential political magazine was about to publicly skewer her for failing to draft a bill.

As a result, she was the last member of the freshman class to submit a piece of legislation, which she did on Oct. 15 — more than nine months into office and four months after the second-tardiest freshman.

Moreover, Congress.org, an organization that monitors the legislature, gave Clarke a power ranking of 366th in Congress, and 36th in the freshman class.
The numbers have left even Clarke’s supporters scratching their heads.

“She has had an incredible opportunity to become a leading freshman,” said Arthur Piccolo, a Democratic insider who vigorously campaigned for Clarke in the heated four-way race to succeed retiring Rep. Major Owens in 2006.
“She has not taken advantage of that at all. It mystifies me. [Her lack of legislation is] a symbolic example of that.”

Clarke has drafted two bills since hearing the complaints from the wonks and the chattering class. Her first bill sought to improve the U.S. Citizen and Immigration Service, where backlogs can force immigrants and naturalized residents to wait years for their documentation.

Eight days later, on Oct. 23, Clarke introduced a second bill that would increase government relief to military families.

Clarke’s spokeswoman, Chic Smith, insisted that quality of legislation was more important than quantity.

“Would it be better for her to introduce a bill that required everybody carry Kleenex, or everybody carry Purell?” said Smith. “There is no deadline for members of Congress [to introduce legislation].

“I don’t understand the emphasis on the amount,” added Smith. “There’s always going to be a first, someone in the middle, someone in the last [place].”

Until recently, that someone was Clarke, who declined to speak with The Brooklyn Paper about her bill-writing shortcomings. But she told Politico, an influential online magazine, that she had “not really concentrated that much on crafting legislation.”

“Part of it was getting my bearings,” added Clarke. “I do have interest. I just haven’t made that my ultimate focus.”

Clarke did not use her mid-year medical leave as an excuse. In July, Clarke had surgery to relieve painful uterine fibroids, and took a six-week leave of absence.

Beyond that, Craig Holman, the campaign finance lobbyist for Public Citizen, a congressional watchdog group, said Clarke’s inaction was not that significant.
“Freshman congressmen traditionally are not the sponsors of much legislation, given their lack of familiarity and networking within Congress,” said Holman. “And the legislation they do sponsor tends to be pretty meaningless.”

Even so, other freshmen representatives have managed to get their focus more quickly. Gus Bilirakis (R–Florida), has already introduced 18 bills, one of which of was passed by the Democratic house just this month.

If Clarke is writing few bills, she may merely be following the example set by her predecessor, Owens. In the last 10 of his 24 years in Congress — presumably when his seniority gave him far more clout than a humble freshman — wrote 102 bills, or about 10 bills per year on average, according to GovTrack.us, an independent legislation-tracking Web site.

Not a single one passed.

http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/30/43/30_43yvetteclarke.html

BrooklynRider
November 4th, 2007, 12:27 AM
Oh, Dear! Marty’s endorsement draws fire from gays

By Gersh Kuntzman
The Brooklyn Paper

A Civil Court race pitting firebrand former Councilman Noach Dear against a lesser-known judge has been thrust into the spotlight by gay and lesbian activists because of Borough President Markowitz’s endorsement of Dear, who was rated as unqualified for the bench by the City Bar Association.

“Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz and homophobic Noach Dear are in bed together,” read a mass mailing put out by the Jim Owles Liberal Democratic Club, a gay-and-lesbian political group.

The mailingcites Dear’s objection to a 1986 “gay rights” bill during his 18 (pre-term-limit) years in the City Council and urges voters to call or e-mail Markowitz’s office to “tell him that an anti-choice, homophobic bigot does not belong on the Civil Court.”

Dear is also backed by the Brooklyn Democratic Party boss, Assemblyman Vito Lopez, in the race for the Civil Court seat against Karen Yellen. The Fifth District covers Dear’s stronghold of Borough Park, plus parts of Bay Ridge, Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights, Windsor Terrace, Sunset Park, and the very southern edge of Park Slope

Markowitz, who has enjoyed the support of the gay and lesbian community for years, issued a less-than-ringing endorsement of Dear, choosing not to even name him in a statement put out by his office late Tuesday.

“I have a long record of support for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community — including supporting gay marriage — and I would never support anyone who would disrespect the rights of gay people, which is why I demanded assurance that as a judge, this candidate (who by the way, lives in Brooklyn, while his opponent does not) would place equal treatment, respect for diversity, and reverence for human rights above all else.”

That answer did not satisfy Allen Roskoff, president of the Jim Owles club.
“I think Marty has made a terrible mistake,” Roskoff said. “I don’t know what he was smoking. Endorsing Dear is unconscionable. It’s despicable. I can’t see him being able to qualify for the endorsement of a gay club after this.”

It’s not only gay activists who have the knives out for Dear. The New York City Bar rated Dear “not approved” based on “failure to affirmatively demonstrate that he possesses the requisite qualifications for the court for which he is a candidate.”

Yellen was rated “approved,” though no further explanation was given in either case.

Yellen, who lives in Manhattan, made headlines last year when she testified against then-party boss Clarence Norman and claimed that he ordered her to hire his cronies as campaign “consultants.”

Out of fear, Yellen testified, she spent $12,000 for fliers she believed she didn’t need and gave $9,000 to a Norman pal who pocketed the cash and did “nothing,” prosecutors said.

Yellen’s testimony has earned her high marks from reformers.

“Karen Yellen’s testimony sent Clarence Norman to prison. She is owed a vote of thanks [from] all those committed to judicial reform,” wrote on blogger on Room Eight, a Web site devoted to New York City politics.

Meanwhile, Dear’s tenure in the Council — which includes angering blacks by traveling to South Africa on an Apartheid fact-finding tour sponsored by the whites-only Johannesburg City Council, and being sued by a group Sri Lankan Tamils who claimed he stole $170,000 from them — is drawing fire.

The Village Voice reported last month that when Dear ran for Congress, his campaign staff forged 47 sequentially numbered money orders in other people’s names to hide a donation of $40,000, which was then 20 times the legal limit.

No criminal charges were filed in that case, but Dear’s treasurer had to pay $45,000 in fines, the Voice reported.

“Those stories [about Dear] are telling it as it actually is,” said Yellen, who has served on various courts since 1993. “But most important, he has no experience on the bench, as opposed to my 15 years as a judge. Also, the records indicate that has never even practiced law. That makes him not qualified for this position.

“People are incensed that he is running,” Yellen added.

Dear did not return a call for comment.

http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/30/36/30_36ohdear.html

BrooklynRider
November 4th, 2007, 12:34 AM
Marty off the gaydar

By Dana Rubinstein
The Brooklyn Paper


Borough President Markowitz’s choice for a Civil Court judgeship won Tuesday’s Democratic primary, but Markowitz may have lost something far bigger: the gay vote.

“We now regard him with universal disdain,” said Alan Fleishman, a Democratic district leader and a board member of the Lambda Independent Democrats, a Park Slope-based gay political club.

“It will be difficult for him to come before gay and lesbian clubs to ask for an endorsement in the future if he’s running in another race,” added Fleishman, hours after the Markowitz-endorsed former Councilman Noach Dear beat Karen Yellen in the off-year primary by a lopsided margin of 3,776 to 2,554 votes.

Markowitz endorsed Dear :eek:even though the City Bar Association rated the Borough Park pol unqualified for the job — but the main objection to his endorsement of the anti-gay Dear came from gay and lesbian activists.

After Dear’s triumph on Tuesday, those activists swung into action.

In an open letter to Markowitz and six other politicians who had backed Dear, the Lambda Independent Democrats, the Stonewall Democratic Club, and the Jim Owles Liberal Democratic Club blasted them for supporting an “unethical bigot.”

The Borough Park politician is most reviled for his vitriolic crusade against a 1986 gay civil rights bill :mad:— though his conservative positions on abortion and other issues have kept him in liberal crosshairs for the decades that he’s been out of (yet seeking) office:mad:.

“It is a disturbing time … when elected officials can endorse a candidate who has a long record of blatant hostility and hatred against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people,” read the letter.

The letter went to Kings County Democratic Party boss and Assemblyman Vito Lopez (D–Bushwick), Assemblyman Dov Hikind (D–Borough Park), Councilmember Vincent Gentile (D–Bay Ridge), Councilman Domenic Recchia (D–Coney Island), Councilman Kendall Stewart (D–Flatbush), and state Sen. Diane Savino (D–Bay Ridge).

Markowitz did not respond to a request for comment.:rolleyes:

In other mud-slinging election news, reform club favorite state Supreme Court Justice Diana Johnson beat Manhattan Civil Court Judge ShawnDya Simpson in the Democratic primary for the Surrogate judgeship. Simpson was endorsed by party boss Lopez, while Johnson was backed by several black elected officials, organizations identified as reform political clubs, and Rev. Al Sharpton. The Surrogate Court, run by two judges, is responsible for handling estate and guardianship cases and, because it dolls out millions of dollars in legal business, is a major source of political patronage.

Johnson beat Simpson 23,454 votes to 16,095.